Forum rapidshare Porn  
Register FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   Forum rapidshare Porn > Adult Index > Adult Mega Threads
Reload this Page Complete resampled Inthecrack sets
Adult Mega Threads Find Large collections Adult Threads Here

Child Porn - Free xxx Adult 16+
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Complete resampled Inthecrack sets
Old
  (#1 (permalink))
admin is Offline
Administrator
 
Posts: 58,754
Join Date: May 2009
   
Default Complete resampled Inthecrack sets - 06-02-2009, 02:01 AM

Dear Inthecrak Fans,

I finally decided to reduce the global size of my inthecrack collection (more than 200 Gb !) with a minimum of quality loss.

I did a lot of tests and I decided to resample all HD videos in 960x540. I compared a lot of codecs (h264, DivX, XviD, Real Video...) and I choosed the "Real Video" format (RV10) for some reasons :
- first the quality : the results are amazing ! Both h264 and Real Video gave the best results, but because Real Video need less encoding time and less CPU power to read videos, I choosed Real Video.
- secondly it's really easy to install Real Video codec on a computer : you just need to install "Real Alternative" ( http://www.free-codecs.com/Real_Alte...e_download.htm ) and that's all ! The player is contained in the Real Alternative package and it works very very fine...
- the last reason is that I like the .mkv container (Matroska). Really better than .avi or .ogm... I thought that it's a good way to promote this container

Last remark : I also compared a lot of resampling algorythms (to downsample from 1920x1080 to 960x540 or from 1280x720 to 960x540) and now I can swear that I choosed the best ! AviSynth contain a lot of resampling algorythms and I compared all of them...

Well, if you have some remarks/questions/requests, don't hesitate to contact me ! It will be always a great pleasure to help inthecrack's fans

I will upload my files by series of entire set : .rar archives won't contain only one video file, but all videos of the concerned set. You will see that the weight difference is really significative. I noticed that usually I reduced the videos size by 3 !

Cheers,

Alain.

ads by AdXpansion
  
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBulletin Skin developed by: ZOMER Style